承上后续: 请BRUCE前辈再多加指教: 我们要求非洲肯尼亚一客人开保兑信用证,虽然在开过来的信用证中49条这样写到49:Confirmation Instruction : Confirm (49.保兑指示:保兑)但是其开出的信用证没有CONFIRMATION L/C 字样,应该不属于保兑信用证.因为非洲人信誉一向不好,我们要求客人请中国银行做为保兑行,并且客人请信用证中作为偿付行的美国运通银行出具了一份note of understanking(应该是相当于***之类的东西吧)呈交给中国银行, 但是中国银行拒绝作为其保兑行,说是开证行曾经有不良记录.现在美国运通银行对非洲客人的邮件回复如下: Dear mike, (MIKE为客人名称) It is unfortunate that we have received such a reply. As per my understanding this may be the Bank of China’s policy not to confirm LCs. I therefore request that you apply the two options below; You request the beneficiary to take the reimbursement undertaking from our American Express New York as enough proof that they will be paid as per the LC terms, since the undertaking constitute the guarantee to pay on fulfillment of the conditions set in the LC and in the undertaking. This is more or less the same as the confirmation of the LC. The other option will be to cancel the LC and allow us to use Commerzbank Shangai who will accept to confirm the LC. The implication of this is that, the Amex Ny reimbursement undertaking charges may not be refunded and will still be borne by the beneficiary in addition to the Commerzbank confirmation charges. Please now advise us on the option to use and we shall act as soon as possible to avoid delay. Regards Charles M Gichuhi. 请问按照***种方法,也就是接受美国运通银行的note of undertaking可不可行啊? 第二种情况如果那个银行是上海商业银行(Commerzbank Shangai不知道是不是笔误,已经要求其确认)作为保兑行,那是应该保险了,虽然我们要承担的费用要增加不少了,但安全收汇***重要,是吧.
------------------ ...
|